Friday, December 29, 2006
Thursday, December 28, 2006
The Vehicle For Social Mobility
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Cuba Will Be 'New Florida'
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Financially Illiterate America
I found this article by route of my morning check on the Drudge Report. The title of the article tells the story: “Report Reveals 2.2 Million Borrowers Face Foreclosure on Subprime Home Loans”. To just play with some numbers lets use the average family size of 2 adults and 1.5 children. Let’s be conservative and say that some of these families are just two adults, which makes the average family size of 3. Multiply that by 2.2 million and you get 6.6 million people. Divide that by the current U.S. population of 300 million and you get 2.2% of the population facing foreclosure on their homes. This is a grim figure.
Simply, there needs to be more control on lending. Clearly, there are people getting loans who should not be and because they are high risk they are paying higher interest which likely makes their odds of defaulting even greater. I can’t help but wonder if these practices are allowed to persist because of the former Fed chief, Allan Greenspan, whose economic growth policy was formed around housing growth. Are we sacrificing the long-term viability of our citizens’ financial health for short-term economic growth?
Another problem is education. Our schools do not teach finance as a subject. Year after year we learn math exercises and English grammar, but we are never taught how to manage our money. This is a basic survival skill in our modern society. Our education system is antiquated. In the past personal finance was not that complicated. You saved if you wanted to buy something and on the rare occasion that you borrowed the terms were simple. The world moves much faster now, partly due to the advances in methods of finance. In order to do business you need to know how to get access to money and the terms of how to use that financial tool. Finance needs to be taught as a part of the standard curriculum.
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Time: It's All About You
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Is Alternative Energy A Black Hole For Investors?
I just read the article, Is 2007 the Year of Tech?, at Red Herring. Honestly, I didn’t read anything earth shattering. But one statement made by Paul Wick got my attention: “Alternative energy continues to be an absolute black hole for investors, in spite of Vinod Khosla and all these other people hyping the crap out of it. It’s always five years away from turning the corner. Whether you are talking fuel cells or solar power, it just isn’t there. It’s not economical. These people are kidding themselves if they think it’s just around the corner.” I think the problem is that people are looking for a silver bullet, one thing that will replace all fossil fuels. That’s just not how it’s going to happen. When it comes to most things variety is good. The same goes for energy. When you become too dependent on one source of energy you are setting yourself up for trouble. Becoming too dependent on any one thing, no matter what it is, is never a good thing. This is why you diversify your investment portfolio. This is why local economies suffer greatly when they become too dependent on any one industry or employer if market dynamics change and facilities close. I think we need to apply this same line of thinking to our energy policy. There needs to be variety. We are starting to see this happen with automobiles and I think it is good. For instance some municipal vehicles are running on natural gas or biodiesel. Individuals are using hybrid cars and are reconsidering electric cars. Hopefully in the future you’ll have more options that 87, 89, and 93 octane unleaded gasoline or diesel. Perhaps you’ll also have a choice of propane, methane, hydrogen, or an electric quick charge where the electric is pulled from a grid supplied with a combination of nuclear, coal, wind, and hydroelectric. This is not a far off reality, it’s happening right now. It will start with a lot of small companies then when the market matures consolidation will take place. The same happened for the oil and railroad industries (among others) it will happen here again. This time, though, we will be left with a more sustainable and less vulnerable way to power our world.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Feed The World
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Communication Is The Key
Monday, December 11, 2006
Old Fashioned Nuclear Power
Friday, December 08, 2006
Moon Bases and Fusion Power
Thursday, December 07, 2006
US-Mexico Relations
If I were born in Mexico I would have most likely crossed the border into the U.S. by now. I can’t blame Mexicans for trying to cross the border at all costs. According to The World Bank, half of Mexico’s population lives in poverty and one-fifth is in extreme poverty. In the U.S. even if you are very poor you still most likely live in better conditions than the majority of the poor in Mexico. For instance, none of our cities have anything like the slums that surround Mexico City. Mexico has problems and it shares a large border with the U.S. So while U.S. foreign policy has been focused on bad governments and assumed threats halfway around the world a storm has been gathering hurricane force right next door and is spilling across onto our side of the border. The result is the current state of illegal immigration. Pat Buchanan calls the situation an Invasion. You have to sensationalize things to sell books. Typically I think of an invasion as being perpetrated by those who have a malicious intent. I don’t think that’s the case here. To restate what I have already said; if I had to choose between poverty and opportunity I would choose to cross the border too.
Recently Mexico elected a new president. But the loser is staging rallies in the street proclaiming to be the legitimate president. And he has supporters. Their economy is bad and their government is corrupt. Our neighbor needs help. By helping our neighbor we would also be helping ourselves. The U.S. needs to take a more active role in directing policy in Mexico if it has any hope of solving the problems. We need to get to the source rather than trying to form plans and policies, such as amnesty, which are simply ill conceived and will not work. U.S. foreign policy needs to focus on working more closely with our close neighbor.
Wednesday, December 06, 2006
Internet Education
I found this paper that provides a picture of what education will look like in the future. I think it paints an accurate picture. Basically, the Internet is finally going to revolutionize our educational system. Right now we are trying to fit computers and the Internet into the traditional educational model. But, this doesn’t get us anywhere. The real power is in using the Internet as a global asynchronous communications platform for constructing a virtual classroom. In this virtual classroom you can find information and mentors that allow you to choose your own method of learning on topics of your choosing so that you can create your own unique transcript. This transcript will follow you for life and will be a record of your unique skill set and knowledge. This transcript will become part of your virtual persona and will also include projects that you have worked on. Rather than performing exercises in a classroom environment, the work that you do in the virtual classroom will actually go toward completing something of value. In essence you will be an apprentice of the particular mentor/teacher whom you are studying under at that time to learn a particular technique. This will increase human learning and productivity tremendously. Also, canned standardized programs will exist that will teach basic concepts on a need-to-know basis. This form of education will move thinking out of the bygone era of the industrial age and into the information age and beyond.
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
Secondary Effects
The December 4, 2006 issue of Time Magazine has an article titled, Why We Worry About The Wrong Things. In the process of discussing the irrationality of choosing to drive instead of fly the article mentioned that during the days following 9/11 approximately 1000 more people died in car accidents than did during the same period the previous year. So if you factor that in, the terrorist attacks can be said to have killed approximately 4000 people instead of the estimated 3000. You could go further and add the number of deaths (both military and civilian) from combat and sectarian violence in Afghanistan and Iraq. This makes the total number of deaths caused by the events of 9/11 higher still. So while this analysis is backward looking it still makes us painfully aware that we must consider just not the immediate effects of our decisions but also every link in the chain of events that follow.
Monday, December 04, 2006
Increase Your Net Worth
For starters, instead of asking how much you have or even how much you can get try asking, “How much can I give?” Second ask, “Does what I have to give have value?” The only legitimate way to make money is for someone to give you money in exchange for something you give to them. This is true whether you are a business, a self-employed person, or an employee of someone else. You GIVE something of value and are compensated by being given money with which you can purchase things that you cannot produce on your own and that are of value to you.
Reframing the situation from “How much can I get” to “How much can I give” is a powerful way to reshape your thinking about how to align your values with what you are doing for a living. Do you have something to give that can benefit others? We humans are interdependent individuals. We rely on others and others rely on us. This is the basis of civilization. Your work and your life only have value if you have something to give. To increase your net worth give and you shall receive.

